< Back to all articles

Alan W. Clark Published in the New York Law Journal

We are excited to share that one of our distinguished trial attorneys and counsel at Duffy & Duffy, PLLC, Alan W. Clark, has been published in the New York Law Journal. His article, “Medical Malpractice Contingency Fee Schedule Needs Amendment,” addresses crucial issues with the current fee structure for medical malpractice cases in New York under Judiciary Law section 474-a. Since its implementation on July 1, 1985, the law has dramatically reduced recoverable attorney fees, creating challenges for legal professionals and malpractice victims seeking compensation.

Due to the complexity and financial risk of medical malpractice cases, with only roughly 25% of these cases being won at trial, the law has made it financially difficult for attorneys to take on these cases. As a result, only substantially wealthy plaintiffs can afford the high hourly fees needed to hire competent legal counsel.

The proposed amendment, NYAB 7448, seeks to update the fee structure to provide attorneys with more equitable compensation and an increased share of recoverable fees. This change could incentivize more attorneys to represent medical malpractice victims, improving their access to skilled legal representation. To learn more about the current fee structure and the potential benefits of this proposed amendment, contact the experienced attorneys at Duffy & Duffy, PLLC.

Choose Duffy & Duffy

The injury attorneys at Duffy & Duffy have dedicated their practice to helping victims who have been hurt as a result of someone else’s carelessness. Our trial lawyers have years of experience litigating and resolving negligence claims, and we can use our knowledge and skill to pursue the compensation you deserve.

  • $800,000,000+ in verdicts and settlements
  • 250+ malpractice cases settled
  • 80+ multi-million dollar settlements

Schedule a Consultation

Please complete the form below and a member of our team will get in touch with you as soon as possible.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.